Leveraging the SoloLearn application for enhanced python programming skills

Muhammad Azam Jamaludin; Mastura Ramli; Mat Sukri Mamat

doi:10.29210/8815501

Leveraging the SoloLearn application for enhanced python programming skills

Muhammad Azam Jamaludin⁽¹⁾, Mastura Ramli⁽²⁾, Mat Sukri Mamat⁽³⁾,
(1) Politeknik Muadzam Shah

Malaysia
(2) Politeknik Muadzam Shah

Malaysia
(3) Politeknik Muadzam Shah

Malaysia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2025 Mastura Ramli

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/8815501

Full Text:

Language : en

Abstract

This study aims at how effectively polytechnic students can learn Python programming with the help of the SoloLearn platform. A smartphone application called SoloLearn provides a variety of coding courses, including Python. It offers quick courses, interactive tests, real-time code execution, and a community-driven learning methodology. Using questionnaires, the effect of SoloLearn on interest, comprehension, and Python competency has been evaluated among polytechnic students. Our findings reveal that SoloLearn enhances student engagement due to its gamified elements like points, badges, and peer challenges also create a more engaging learning environment. The instant feedback and hands-on coding exercises improve students' understanding and retention of Python concepts. SoloLearn proves to be an effective supplementary tool for polytechnic students learning Python. It provides an approachable and engaging educational experience. Its first mobile design appeals particularly to students who require convenience and flexibility.

Keywords

Python Programming; Learning Styles; Coding

References

Ararao, J. (2023). How can I activate my Sololearn account? SoloLearn. Retrieved from https://careerkarma.com/wiki/SoloLearn-getting-started/

Cárdenas-Cobo, J.; Puris, A.; Novoa-Hernández, P.; Parra-Jiménez, Á.; Moreno-León, J.; Benavides, D. (2021). Using scratch to improve learning programming in college students: A positive experience from a non-weird country. Electronics, 10, 1180.

Deng, W.; Pi, Z.; Lei, W.; Zhou, Q.; Zhang, W. (2020). Pencil Code improves learners¬ computational thinking and computer learning attitude. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 28, 90–104.

Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business: A skillbuilding approach (3rd ed.). USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification". Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record.

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2017). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309-326.

Kim, Y.; Kim, J.; Lee, W. (2013) Effect of Block-Based Python Programming Environment on Programming Learning. Appl. Sci. 13, 10898. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910898

Seraj, M.; Katterfeldt, E.S.; Bub, K.; Autexier, S.; Drechsler, R. Scratch and Google Blockly. (2019). How girls¬ programming skills and attitudes are influenced. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli, Finland, pp. 1–10.

Tavares, P.C.; Henriques, P.R.; Gomes, E.F. (2017). A Computer Platform to Increase Motivation in Programming Students-PEP. CSEDU 1, 284–291.

Yong, S.T.; Tiong, K.M. (2022). A Blended Learning Approach: Motivation and Difficulties in Learning Programming. Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ., 18, 1–16.

Wing, J.M. (2006). Computational thinking. Commun. ACM, 49, 33–35.

McCall, D.; Kölling, M. (2019). A new look at novice programmer errors. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ, 19, 38.

Xinogalos, S.; Satratzemi, M.; Malliarakis, C. (2017). Microworlds, games, animations, mobile apps, puzzle editors and more: What is important for an introductory programming environment? Educ. Inf. Technol., 22, 145–176.